The Best MySuper Products

At the end of August, APRA released the results of its inaugural MySuper Product Performance Test, designed to help Australians more easily compare the performance of their super fund. Of the 80 MySuper products on the market, 76 were assessed by APRA. 13 products were found to have failed the performance benchmark.1

Cue headlines across mainstream and social media alike, naming and shaming those 13 funds and urging members to switch. 

But a closer look at the list of failed funds may cause some concern. Among the failed funds were some familiar names: Colonial First State and BT Super’s Retirement Wrap, for example. And, should a member of a failed fund do as APRA suggests and compare their fund using the YourSuper Comparison tool, they may be confused by the results. BT Super’s Retirement Wrap for born in the 1980s, for example, achieved an 8.18% net return over 7 years. Despite this result being on-par with Aware Super Growth (8.17%) and Local Government Super’s Balanced Growth product (7.96%), BT’s product has a clear ‘Underperforming’ category by its name.2

The best performing fund (and the highest risk fund, with over 90% allocated to growth investments) was the Local Government Super’s High Growth product, which had a return of 9.46% over the 7 years. This may be a good return when compared to other MySuper products, however when compared to the High Growth Index (which is not a MySuper product), over the same 7 year period you could have achieved a return of 10.50% and the fees would have been more than 50% less.

What is the benchmark?

According to APRA, the 76 funds were graded as either a ‘pass’ or ‘fail’, based on an analysis of comparison of fees versus performance over a period of seven years.

Some argue the test was flawed, because it did not tell members why and by how much their fund failed the test. The test is a retrospective, relative performance assessment where the so-called underperforming products are compared against top performing products. Any product that falls half of one per cent (0.5%) below the median is labelled as failing.

What should you do?

Each of the failed funds is required by APRA to write to their members alerting them about their underperformance and encouraging them to move elsewhere. What will you do if you receive this letter?

In many cases, retaining a ‘failed’ product may be in your best interests. As we know, there are many important factors to consider when choosing a super fund, such as appropriate levels of risk, the insurance coverage and even whether you agree with a fund’s investment approach i.e. an ethical approach.

I’m happy to announce that none of my clients were in the poorest performing funds, however if you were, as discussed above, I have concerns basing your super fund choice only on performance.

The information provided in this newsletter does not constitute financial product advice. The information is of a general nature only and does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs. It should not be used, relied upon, or treated as a substitute for specific professional advice. We recommend that you obtain your own professional advice before making any decision in relation to your particular requirements or circumstances. For details of Synchron (our financial services provider AFS 243313) privacy policy please visit 
Copyright © 2021 Webb Financial, All rights reserved.

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.